Thursday, December 06, 2012

Time to revise outdated section 49-O

time to revise outdated 49 O

TEXT
Time to revise the outdated Rule 49-O 

Ref Election Commission Press Note No.ECI/PN/35/2008 
Dated: 5th December, 2008 

To: The Election Commissioner of India 

Sir, 

You are aware that Section 49-O of The Conduct of Electoral Rules, 1961 reads as under : 

Sec. 49-O Elector deciding not to vote:-- 
----- 
If an elector, after his electoral roll number has been duly entered in the register of voters in Form-17A and has put his signature or thumb impression hereon as required under sub-rule (1) of rule 49L, decided not to record his vote, a remark to this effect shall be made against the said entry in Form 17A by the presiding officer and the signature or thumb impression of the elector shall be obtained against such remark. 
----- 


This rule was framed in 1961 after 2 general elections had been held in the country. It appears that in these 2 elections it came to the notice of ECI (Election Commission of India) that there are some voters who may not want to cast vote It is for such people that the Rules provided for the procedure of using form No.17-A as detailed in Section 49-O. For long people in this country have thought that this provision is made for those voters who have not liked the candidature of any of the contesting candidate. Otherwise why would any voter, who feels that none of the contesting candidates is worthy will still take the trouble to reach the polling booth and appear for voting? Would he/she not go to enjoy the holiday as indeed many of the voters who know that ECI does not care for their opinion do go away to a holiday picnic. Sadly your notification suggests that they were right and some of us who trusted our democratic principles were wrong. 

We wish to submit that the Rules framed in 1961 are today outdated and insufficient and fail to take proper cognizance of the feelings, decision and voting right of a voter as regards the candidates contesting the election. Most important aspect is that voting choice expressed through from 17-A is not counted its value is that of a waste-paper as indeed your notification seeks to confirm. 

Any voter, who feels that none of the contesting candidates is worthy of being elected and has still taken the trouble to reach the polling booth and appear for voting, definitely wishes his or her vote to be recorded and counted. Hence the present Section 49-O needs to be modified. It should now be provided that the Ballot paper will indicate NO CHOICE or None of the Above as one of the possible voting choices and the electronic machine will also provide for this choice and have a system to record and count the same. 

The Right to Express our choice through Vote is the highest right given in a democracy. Even when we wish to declare all the contesting candidates unworthy, our opinion MUST be recorded and counted during Election. Todays rules deny us this Fundamental Right. It is a matter of abrogation of our right. People in this country look up to you and expect you to be proactive and give a platform to their feeling. Hence we the undersigned request that necessary change in the Rules be made so that all the thinking voters get a right to record their opinion which should then be counted during the process of counting of votes and be declared while declaring the results of election. This will necessitate some further reforms which we hope, will occur eventually. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ed
  • (edpcra@hotmail.com)
  • Comments
  • Also see 2 notifications of Election Commission which mention that this reco is made to GOI in 2001 and again in 2004. But no persuation?
  • City, Country
  • India
  • Number of signatories on whose behalf you are signing
  • В
http://eci.nic.in/eci_main/PROPOSED_ELECTORAL_REFORMS.pdf
See more comments on         http://www.petitiononline.com/petitions/fix_49_o/authors/print_petition

vishal agarwal
  • (vishal.slts@gmail.com)
  • Comments
  • this is important
  • City, Country
  • Hisar, India
  • Number of signatories on whose behalf you are signing
  • 9



bharat kumar
  • (kushwaha.bharat@gmail.com)
  • Comments
  • We all indians want this.
  • City, Country
  • Delhi


kanhayalal m rathod
  • (skanhayalal@yahoo.com)
  • Comments
  • candidates are not abal for the chair, last year i tried but not i got so please put negative voting facility under section 49.0
  • City, Country
  • nipani taluka chikodi(constituency) dist.belgaum
  • Number of signatories on whose behalf you are signing
  • many younger and old man with me



Anil V. Maydeo
  • Comments
  • there should be another button as to, clicking gives all the details of the Candidates, whether Criminal, and hence forth
  • City, Country
  • Mumbai
  • Number of signatories on whose behalf you are signing
  • 3



Dr. Mandar Akkalkotkar
  • (ayurvedscienceforum@gmail.com)
  • Comments
  • How to get this done? Pl. do guide, so that further communication with law ministry/ Chief Election Commissioner can be made.
  • City, Country
  • Pune, India
  • Number of signatories on whose behalf you are signing
  • 1




  • kavitha
    • (forchakris@yahoo.com)
  • subhadra
    • (forchakris@yahoo.com)



Dr. Sher Singh
  • (doctorshersingh@yahoo.co.in)
  • Comments
  • most of the people want to revise this Rule, several of them raise their voice, some take active acion in form of this compagin or otherwise, few of them sign it or support action of others and very few do not do anything except to wait for a change, however the sad seen of the fact is this that this very few is very big and this some is really very few, however good seen is this that NONE wants to withdraw this democracy, not even those who disrespects it. ITS MY GREAT DEMOCRACY WHERE UNDEMOCRATIC PEOPLE ARE ENJOYING THE DEMOCRACY AND DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING AND PAYING FOR ITS EXISTANCE.
  • City, Country
  • Bhooda Gate, Post Office & Tahsil-DEEG, Dist. BHARATPUR, RAJASTHAN, INDIA- 321203
  • Number of signatories on whose behalf you are signing
  • Myself presently, however many others may also want the same






















































No comments: